Regarding hourly action limit

[Archer of Crosis]

does playing poker count towards hourly action limit? cause if so that would suck. also, is destroying ash count towards the limit. I'm just a bit confused as to what is actually considered an action.

[Macca123]

Destroying ash, yes. As for poker, not sure.

[Glitchless]

Everything.

[doug]

so even chat ?

[Archer of Crosis]

Originally Posted by Glitchless

Everything.

ouch, now i feel the update burn
with poker you have to click multiple buttons to raise , etc. Kinda puts the poker players at a disadvantage, especially if they ash they way i do.

o wells, just have to either not ash when i play poker or stop playing poker all together, i guess :S

[Macca123]

I doubt you send more than one message per second when chatting. Also, a poker hand takes about 100 seconds, and you only do what, 6 actions?

[doug]

yeh but if your chatting and bezz in the same hour it limit the bezz so basically what it does it limits u from talking while u bezz or doing anything else at all like if u did the 100 kills and bezz in same hour u couldn't finish a 2 k plex

just seems like maybe it should be limited to like actions liek playing poker would be 1 action bezzing move and /pe was action tht way u dont suffer sucha penalty

[Macca123]

I think what you're trying to say is that actions be grouped into different types of actions so that they are on different 'lists', similar to what happens with beast kills with regs and AA's. I brought this idea up somewhere earlier.

[Eyemredy]

Glitchless: There's now an hourly limit on the amount of actions you can do in RWK - DONT WORRY - you won't hit this limit unless you are using questionable tactics i.e. hotkeys to farm massive plexes which is frowned upon. If you're one of the 5 people that play that might actually hit this limit, sorry suckah.

Or the movement limit could be increased as it seems almost everyone who has a plex/bezz job on both servers has at least hit this limit on one, if not more chars.

[Lakhnerth Parabol]

My critique on this particular rule is why per character?

IP address can obviously be circumvented by Proxy

However there's only certain people that can circumvent it through the multiple characters and that's people that already have a ton of money. To my knowledge the most well known macroers were bezzing with multiple characters at the same time so doesn't that kind of forfeit the whole idea behind this rule?

Have you considered another method to restrict amount of actions or is this closed to discussion? I'm sincerely curious because as a person who only has one character and values having a life over having 50 characters it feels like a rule that doesn't have the effect you're looking for.

Just my feedback.

[Eyemredy]

/info life

[Lakhnerth Parabol]

Why are you posting trite things that are off-topic?

[Archer of Crosis]

Originally Posted by Lakhnerth Parabol

My critique on this particular rule is why per character?

IP address can obviously be circumvented by Proxy

However there's only certain people that can circumvent it through the multiple characters and that's people that already have a ton of money. To my knowledge the most well known macroers were bezzing with multiple characters at the same time so doesn't that kind of forfeit the whole idea behind this rule?

Have you considered another method to restrict amount of actions or is this closed to discussion? I'm sincerely curious because as a person who only has one character and values having a life over having 50 characters it feels like a rule that doesn't have the effect you're looking for.

Just my feedback.

I echo LP's statements as I too only have one char.

[Eyemredy]

I'm sincerely curious because as a person who only has one character and values having a life over having 50 characters it feels like a rule that doesn't have the effect you're looking for.

Learn what you type before you go "wut r u talk bout???"

[Lakhnerth Parabol]

Originally Posted by Lakhnerth Parabol

Why are you posting trite things that are off-topic?

Originally Posted by /info life

During internet conversations where one party has deemed himself at a loss he will sometimes revert to using the phrase
'At least I have a life!' Such a claim, while true for all those breathing, implies that his life is somehow better than
the person he has attempted to insult. Statistics would argue that those who play multiplayer games only to find themselves
losing in the game as well as in their heated debate would be more prone to fail in just about all other missions in life
aside perhaps from winning the coveted 'Most Improved' award at their community college.

Originally Posted by Hypocrite

Learn what you type before you go "wut r u talk bout???"

Now away with you trolling mongrel.

[Macca123]

I think (correct me if I am wrong) that the idea of it being per char is that someone who is either 7 rowing or building on a character cannot do huge amounts per hour, whereas if you're not doing that then you can just use multiple chars and he doesn't care as much.

[doug]

Originally Posted by Macca123

I think what you're trying to say is that actions be grouped into different types of actions so that they are on different 'lists', similar to what happens with beast kills with regs and AA's. I brought this idea up somewhere earlier.

yeh thts what i sort of meant so there was a limit on each section and not just all actions included under 1 area as anyone tht wants to bezz cant do anything else at all fot tht hour tht they cxhoose to bezz and i ahve hit this limit many times while bezzing had to change all my bezz times so i could avoid hitting the limit but now do nothing for the 4 hours of bezzing or so as any other action will limit income

[Lakhnerth Parabol]

@Macca: Other than the fact that I actually am not sure what you're even saying I don't know how any action being performed by a single character shouldn't hold the same restriction for someone who holds multiple characters. Perhaps you could elaborate on what you're saying because I can't figure it out.

[Macca123]

Well I think that the limit was brought in to stop people making huge plexes on single characters (because you can't transport and 7-row kds from another character). This means that he doesn't care if you start doing actions on another character, because you can't do stuff to the first characters kingdoms.
As for not having multiple chars in the first place, you can acquire them pretty cheap these days, if you can afford to upgrade a char, you can afford to buy one. If you didn't buy upgrades for your char, but you ashed them or w/e then just do the same for another character.

[DQM]

that and of course people bezzling with macros / farming the huge plexes

technically you could have 2 characters sose both and 7 row with both where one does one plex and the other does the others windows side by side or as some people do bezzle with 2 characters or more running up and down alternate rows / columns

It could also have the side effect to slowing down people ash gain if he thinks too many people have earned ungodly amounts of ash by ashing.... not guides, not poker, not buying selling just pure clicking and fighting.